Comments on: Clintons threaten another 911

By: Mr. Charrington

Mr. Charrington — Wed, 02 May 2007 00:49:44 +0000

12. Repeal, Set afire, destroy fascist laws like the patroit act, which are based on false threats from false enemies in order to gain control over personal lives and take away our freedoms.

By: drunkenhunter

drunkenhunter — Tue, 01 May 2007 23:56:47 +0000

All Presidential Candidates should make pledges like those below. If they
refuse, then you should refuse to vote for them.

1. No More Oil Wars.

2. Work for independence from foreign oil on day one.

3. No more wars for corporate profit.

4. No more secret deals for $4 per gallon gas.

5. No more Chicken Hawks promoting wars of choice when they themselves avoided combat.

6. Make government green–if you can’t make what you have the most control over
green, I don’t care about your plans to make the country green.

7. No torture.

8. No lying about torture.

9. No re-defining torture.

10. No drunken hunting.

11. No wars against imaginary enemies who do not constitute an immanent threat to the US.

By: Mr. Charrington

Mr. Charrington — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:58:46 +0000

I’m still marveling at how stupid the Clintons think America is. So basically they admit just like the current administration they can’t stop an attack on America and they can now predict an attack in advance (where was this talent before 911) so we should vote for them because they can continue where the Bush administration left off?

They’re so full of shit … A vote for Clinton is a vote for status quo.

By: Gdog

Gdog — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:05:20 +0000

I don’t think they’re “threatening” another 911, but they’re definitely trying to use the preexisting threat of such a possibility to their advantage. I do like how McAuliffe says, “No matter who I call, he has already called them three or four times”. LOL! Might as well just say, “no matter how hard we work, they’re beating us in this race”.

IMO, Clinton’s tenure within Senate circles doesn’t mean she’ll be more prepared. It means she’s spent a longer time engulfed by corruption and is that much more likely to carry on current agendas.

By: Sheldon

Sheldon — Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:36:10 +0000

If Hillary Clinton is elected preident, it will be a disaster for U.S. national security. Al-Qaeda plotted 9/11 on Bill Clinton’s watch; who could believe that Hillary would do better? Not I.

By: Mr. Charrington

Mr. Charrington — Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:14:12 +0000

Is there any difference between the fear mongering Clintons trying to scare us into voting for Hillary and Bush saying “Weapons of mass destruction” to get us to follow them into a unjust war?

I hope America has learned something from our voting mistakes — lets not repeat them.