Click here to view the embedded video.

Related posts:

1. CNN and YouTube Co-Sponsor Presidential Debate CNN’s Andersen Cooper and YouTube host 1st of it’s kind,...
2. Shadow Government Bunkers: Security Heightened at Underground Storage Facilities Around the US. As we’ve noted before on a number of occasions, the...
3. C.I.A. out of control threatening to destroy our Government Documentary outlining chilling activities of the C.I.A. over the last...

A little noticed provision in the House Armed Services Committee’s National Defense Authorization Act would authorize the United States to use military force anywhere there are terrorism suspects, including within the U.S. itself, according to the American Civil Liberties Union.

Section 1034 was added to the bill [PDF] by the committee’s chairman, Rep. Buck McKeon (R-CA).

“Congress may soon vote on a new declaration of worldwide war without end, and without clear enemies,” the ACLU warned in a statement. “A ‘sleeper provision’ deep inside defense bills pending before Congress could become the single biggest hand-over of unchecked war authority from Congress to the executive branch in modern American history.”

The only opposition to the provision has come from Rep. John Garamendi (D-CA), who offered an amendment to strike Section 1034 while the House Armed Services Committee was reviewing the bill. The committee passed the National Defense Authorization Act by a 60 to 1 vote — without the proposed amendment — with Garamendi as the sole dissenter.

Garamendi said he plans to introduce the amendment again on the House floor, where debate on the bill will begin the week of May 23.

“President Obama has not sought new war authority,” the ACLU said. “In fact, his administration has made clear that it believes it already has all of the authority that it needs to fight terrorism.”

“But Congress is considering monumental new legislation that would grant the president – and all presidents after him – sweeping new power to make war almost anywhere and everywhere.”

Garamendi said the National Defense Authorization Act also extends the war in Afghanistan, delays the repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, and furthers billions of dollars in wasteful Pentagon spending.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/05/16/aclu-national-defense-bill-authorizes-worldwide-war-without-end/

Related posts:

1. Number of States Rejecting National I.D. Card Growing [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMrS2NdJLWU[/youtube] When Congress passed the REAL ID ACT last...
2. Yale / Skull and Bones State first to use National ID cards? Starting July 24 New Haven residents can apply for National...
3. Restoring Habeas Corpus to America, needs your vote. “The ACLU has created a website to help promote grassroots...

You’re sound asleep when you hear a thump outside your bedroom door. Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled whispers. At least two people have broken into your house and are moving your way. With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed and pick up your shotgun. You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch toward the door and open it. In the darkness, you make out two shadows.

One holds something that looks like a crowbar. When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the shotgun and fire. The blast knocks both thugs to the floor. One writhes and screams while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside. As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you’re in trouble.
In your country, most guns were outlawed years before, and the few That are privately owned are so stringently regulated as to make them useless. Yours was never registered. Police arrive and inform you that the second burglar has died. They arrest you for First Degree Murder and Illegal Possession of a Firearm. When you talk to your attorney, he tells you not to worry: authorities will probably plea the case down to manslaughter.

“What kind of sentence will I get?” you ask.

“Only ten-to-twelve years,” he replies, as if that’s nothing.”Behave yourself, and you’ll be out in seven.”
The next day, the shooting is the lead story in the local newspaper. Somehow, you’re portrayed as an eccentric vigilante while the two men you shot are represented as choirboys. Their friends and relatives can’t find an unkind word to say about them. Buried deep down in the article, authorities acknowledge that both “victims” have been arrested numerous times. But the next day’s headline sa ys it all: “Lovable Rogue Son Didn’t Deserve to Die.” The thieves have been transformed from career criminals into Robin Hood-type pranksters. As the days wear on, the story takes wings. The national media picks it up, then the international media. The surviving burglar has become a folk hero.
Your attorney says the thief is preparing to sue you, and he’ll probably win. The media publishes reports that your home has been burglarized several times in the past and that you’ve been critical of local police for their lack of effort in apprehending the suspects. After the last break-in, you told your neighbor that you would be prepared next time. The District Attorney uses this to allege that you were lying in wait for the burglars.

A few months later, you go to trial. The charges haven’t been reduced, as your lawyer had so confidently predicted. When you take the stand, your anger at the injustice of it all works against you. Prosecutors paint a picture of you as a mean , vengeful man. It doesn’t take long for the jury to convict you of all charges. The judge sentences you to life in prison.

This case really happened. On August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk , England, killed one burglar and wounded a second. In April, 2000, he was convicted and is now serving a life term.
How did it become a crime to defend one’s own life in the once great British Empire ?

It started with the Pistols Act of 1903. This seemingly reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or felons and established that handgun sales were to be made only to those who had a license. The Firearms Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include not only handguns but all firearms except shotguns.
Later laws passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying of any weapon by private citizens and mandated the registration of all shotguns.

Momentum for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after the Hungerford mass shooting in 1987. Michael Ryan, a mentally disturbed Man with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the streets shooting everyone he saw. When the smoke cleared, 17 people were dead.
The British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of “gun control”, demanded even tougher restrictions. (The seizure of all privately owned handguns was the objective even though Ryan used a rifle.)
Nine years later, at Dunblane , Scotland , Thomas Hamilton used a semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public school.
For many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally unstable, or worse, criminals. Now the press had a real kook with which to beat up law-abiding gun owners. Day after day, week after week, the media gave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a total ban on all handguns. The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later, sealed the fate of the few sidearm still owned by private citizens.
During the years in which the British gover nment incrementally took Away most gun rights, the notion that a citizen had the right to armed self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism. Authorities refused to grant gun licenses to people who were threatened, claiming that self-defense was no longer considered a reason to own a gun. Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or rapists were charged while the real criminals were released.
Indeed, after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was quoted as saying, “We cannot have people take the law into their own hands.” All of Martin’s neighbors had been robbed numerous times, and several elderly people were severely injured in beatings by young thugs who had no fear of the consequences. Martin himself, a collector of antiques, had seen most of his collection trashed or stolen by burglars.
When the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns were given three months to turn them over to local authorities. Being good British subjects, most people obeyed the la w. The few who didn’t were visited by police and threatened with ten-year prison sentences if they didn’t comply. Police later bragged that they’d taken nearly 200,000 handguns from private citizens. How did the authorities know who had handguns? The guns had been registered and licensed. Kind of like cars. Sound familiar?

WAKE UP AMERICA, THIS IS WHY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS PUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN OUR CONSTITUTION.
It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds..”
–Samuel Adams

Related posts:

1. Life in Prison for Illegally Downloading Music? Oregon recently tried to pass a law that would imprison...
2. FEMA Has Clandestinely Empowered Clergy To Assist Disarm American Public It has been expressed privately to Clergy members that “quarantines,...
3. Journalist Says Ron Paul’s life may be in danger Renowned bestselling author Daniel Estulin says he has received information...

Related posts:

1. CNN and YouTube Co-Sponsor Presidential Debate CNN’s Andersen Cooper and YouTube host 1st of it’s kind,...
2. Gordon Brown Calls for EU Global Rule! (24th March 09) You still think NWO is a joke do ya? [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyTRCZABaDI[/youtube]...
3. Ron Paul – Says “Obama isn’t for Change at all” Ron Paul covers a lot of ground in these two...

It was co-signed by chancellor Merkle of Germany with a ceremony in the White House without consultation of congress at all.

Actual Fear is setting in to government members in both republicans and democrats. Great powers being taken on by Bush that don’t have a basis in the Constitution. Students of history will remember in Rome the counsels that wanted emperors or dictators created “emergencies” and then declared themselves Emperor in charge to solve the problem.
NSPD51 and HSPD20, Bush has given himself the exact same authority and power in which he can declare at anytime for any reason. Even down to taking control of privately owned businesses if he chooses to do so.

Related posts:

1. Bush: Congress has no right to challenge anything I say Seems President Bush is once again re-writing the definition of...
2. Economic Anarchy Aloha Ohana, I’m sitting here this morning watching the stock...
3. Blueprint for the North American Union (Documentary) The European Union is the model for the North American...

It is IMPOSSIBLE to be this dumb. I’m not trying to be funny or ironical. If our country is failing this miserably, it must be on purpose. There, I said it. Now, let me explain why..

The other day it occurred to me how one decision after the next is almost always the worst possible decision our leaders could ever make. It’s not that the decisions are flawed in some way or against my own personal interests. It’s that they are literally the worst possible decisions imagineable!

I started thinking back and reminiscing about my past experiences. My thoughts were taken back to the small select few people throughout the course of my life I’ve been so fortunate to know who were either in some way mentally challenged or stunted in some way that caused them to make poor decisions.

Don’t get me wrong. I have an affinity for the innocent, challenged people of the world. I look at them like children; innocent. It’s impossible for me to feel angry or upset at someone who does something wrong or bad out of ignorance.

Some of the people who popped up in my thoughts were literally mentally retarded. Smart enough to be in the US Military, but clearly the dumbest functioning citizens in our country. No matter what they did, be it drive a HumV or wield an M-16, these people scared us all with how mindless and brainless they were. Very, very scary individuals whose decisions are like that of a dog or a child. You can see that they want to do the right thing very badly, they are just incapable of understanding what they are ‘supposed to do’ and they make mistakes all the time!

It was always sad but I always pitied people like that because they were innocent. They always had a balance too. Very dumb but very nice, something along those lines.

But, never have I seen a single ‘dumb’ person who was consistently dumb on every issue. It’s virtually impossible to be the absolute best or absolute worst at something on this grand of a scale. Dumbest in the room, yeah. Dumbest on your block, sure. Dumbest on campus? I suppose, but even by that time, it gets really hard to argue because it’s harder to track.

The dumbest Guy on Campus Argument…

Most colleges hold around 20-30K students. Somebody has to be the dumbest person there. Ha! But, who? How do you track it? By GPA? Not really, because that would include the guys who drink themselves to flat F averages. Loser is not the same as Dumb.

What about external, undocumented life challenges like the girl who is pregnant and in an abusive relationship with a drugged out, out-of-work husband who is working her ass off through college who is smart enough to be an attorney but incapable of proving it because of circumstances? She’s not dumb. Just outmatched by life.

Plus, what constitutes dumb? Bad grades? Bad decisions? Is there a test one can take? Or, maybe it depends on how much money you make? Or, how many people you make laugh? Or, how well you can play the piano? They are all important skills that require brains and, inversely, things that one can be dumb at.

Perhaps, we have to get to the core. Perhaps the ultimate test is that of survival. The dumbest of the dumb cannot even survive. They stumble and fall, not to embarrassment or to defeat, but to death and obliteration. The best example of these types of people are explained bye the Darwin Awards.

“A Darwin Award is a tongue-in-cheek honor named after evolutionary theorist Charles Darwin. Awards have been given for people who “do a service to Humanity by removing themselves from the Gene pool”, i.e., lose the ability to reproduce. It is for people who kill or, more rarely, sterilize themselves accidentally by attempting to do stupid feats. As described in the Darwin Award books: The Awards honour people who ensure the long-term survival of the human race by removing themselves from the gene pool in a sublimely idiotic fashion.”

This may be the true definition of dumb. So, lets use this as a base for the argument. It’s virtually impossible to be the dumbest of the dumb and survive.

Now, we can look at the current administration and see that there is a collapse happening all around them. They do appear as if they could win the ultimate Darwin Award someday soon for not only removing themselves from the gene pool, but for removing the rest of America from the gene pool along with them.

But, that’s not my argument. I’m not arguing that the Bush Administration is stupid. I’m arguing something else entirely.

Take a look at the winners of the Darwin awards and tell me how many of the winners throughout time have been highly educated people. How many were rich? How many were organized, government leaders with think tanks supporting their every decision? My argument is that if someone were dumb, that’s one thing. Really, really dumb? That’s still the same thing.

My argument is that in order for the Bush Administration to destroy America this fast and consistently make the worst decisions imaginable, they must either collectively be the dumbest group of people ever or they must be very smart people who are on a mission to achieve a very specific goal.

It is very unlikely that they are a collective group of morons. After all, they are predominantly ivy league graduates. They generally come from backgrounds with way more support and much more opportunity than most. People in these types of environments tend to thrive and become exceptionally successful people. Not dumb, ignorant losers that destroy everything in their paths, accidentally.

For the most powerful group of people on the planet to be this destructive, they MUST be doing it on purpose. They MUST be purposefully and systematically destroying our country. Is this not fair to say? Is it not logical?

I know my argument is not 100% without holes. I could write a 500 page book on the subject and still there may be holes. But, I think my basic argument is sound.

The highest form of our government is intended to consist of the smartest, most capable people with the highest moral character and most integrity. For this group to fail is unlikely. With this collection of minds, it should be almost impossible to do less than 99% on any challenge. Their resources are phenomenal and endless. Their collective brain power is incredible.

Yet, this group has destroyed our foreign relations and brought us months or even weeks or days from a war that could lead us into WWIII, a nuclear war, mind you. The rest of the world either pities us or hates us. We are inches away from total economic collapse. The core of our constitution has been rewritten to allow room for a dictatorship. Our basic rights have been stripped away from us. Several of the most respected congressmen in our country who have run for office have argued vehemently that our country is at its end and ready to collapse – that it’s happening right in front of our eyes.

People have listened but the big business owned media has strategically silenced the voice of these respected leaders and manipulated the outcome with carefully crafted debates and sneaky, underhanded practices intended to undermine the election processes. Elections have been rigged. Voting in this country is a joke. The stability of our nation has not only been damaged, but virtually destroyed from the inside out.

I challenge anyone to debate this in the comments.

Related posts:

1. What American city will you trade for a war with Iran? If a war breaks out with Iran and we can...
2. Bush Administration to Attack 7 Countries in 5 Years Retired Army General, Wesley Clark, Supreme Allied Commander in Europe...
3. Impeach Bush – “Bush Should be Impeached for 9/11, Iraq, Fascism” Here’s Bill Maher talking to uber asshat Scarbororogh October 25,...

<img src=”http://www.polidics.com/images/void.png” height=”15″ width=”1″ />

Click here to view the embedded video.

Related posts:

1. Ron Paul – Says “Obama isn’t for Change at all” Ron Paul covers a lot of ground in these two...
2. CNN and YouTube Co-Sponsor Presidential Debate CNN’s Andersen Cooper and YouTube host 1st of it’s kind,...
3. How to scare the shit out of America and make them do anything The Rise of Neoconservatism to power in America is documented...

How does this benefit Americans and American sovereignty? I couldn’t find another example in history where any country allowed a non native to become leader where it turned out good for that country’s people – can you?

What a nasty country we have become —

Related posts:

1. Homeland Security Committee not allowed to view Martial Law Plans. I see this gentleman from Oregon more and more on...

Related posts:

1. CNN and YouTube Co-Sponsor Presidential Debate CNN’s Andersen Cooper and YouTube host 1st of it’s kind,...
2. Cheney To America — Go Fu*k Yourself Well there you have it America — we don’t need...
3. Cheney wants National Security Dept shut down because they asked about his security secrets AFP World News Politics, Friday, June 22, 2007 White...

Related posts:

1. CNN and YouTube Co-Sponsor Presidential Debate CNN’s Andersen Cooper and YouTube host 1st of it’s kind,...
2. 27 Events Suggest Coming Dictatorship in America? Corruption. American rights being stripped away. Bookmark and read up...
3. Glen Beck CNN – “Ron Paul Supporters A Domestic Threat” “Keep in mind, once you have no voice, you can’t...